In both works, the government creates the sense of a utopian world. When the reader sees this, it imparts a sense of horror in the seemingly Utopian world, and thus makes the two pieces of literature dystopic.Īnother aspect that connects the two pieces of literature together is the idea of a totalitarian government ruling the people. The government utilizes censorship while the common people accept it. Thus when the two books of dystopic literature are compared, the similar motif of censorship can be seen to play a huge part in the way the world runs. They could take one fact one day, and the completely opposite fact another. In a similar way to Fahrenheit 451, the people come to gradually accepting the censored documents that reach them. By changing the information, there is no proof that people have against the validity of the government, and therefore people are sedated. This is also censorship in order to keep the proles, the majority of the population, ignorant. In this quote, Winston works in the Ministry of Truth to change the information that reaches the public. Similarly, a quote from 1984 explains, “The messages he had received referred to articles or news items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or…rectify…It was therefore necessary to rewrite a paragraph of Big Brother’s speech…” (38, 39). People’s minds begin to dull from lack of reading and in the end people accept the fact that the government controls them and their actions. Thus, as more books are burned, more history, information is being erased. A perfect world must satisfy all of them, so if a book comes up that someone doesn’t like, burn it. Beatty is declaring that there are many minorities as well as distinct groups of people. White people don’t feel good about Uncle Tom’s Cabin. In Fahrenheit 451, Beatty describes,” Colored people do not like Little Black Sambo. They desire individuals to just do, and thus it becomes an ideal apparently Utopian world that the reader interprets as a piece of dystopic literature. Nevertheless, police states such as the ones in Fahrenheit 4 do not want people to believe. The less censorship there is, the more individuals begin to believe, which according to requirements today, is an advantage. Yet censorship can also become a tough principle to understand, for censorship enables the federal government to influence how individuals think. All governments have some type of censorship, and some federal governments have less censorship than others. 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 are comparable dystopic literatures by a typical style of censorship in which the federal government withholds or censors information, by a comparable thread of a police state running the dystopic world, and by a common knowledge of the reality that the lead character and the villain both hold.Ĭensorship is an amazing easy idea: the ability of the government to keep or change info that passes into the general public. The settings of both books are different and the characters are distinct nevertheless, both of these books are likewise very similar. George Orwell’s 1984, and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 illustrates two various dystopic worlds. That is the dystopic world that authors such as Bradbury and George Orwell pictures in their books, a world that exists under the image of utopia, and yet to the reader appears like a foreign, inhumane house controlled by an all-powerful government. Quickly, it becomes a problem, a world of illusions, of lies. And the more that is exposed about the world, the more dreadful it ends up being. Therefore the Utopian world isn’t so Utopian any longer. It lacks many of the qualities of life that exist today. Nevertheless, this Utopian world is revealed to have defects. It might even be the photo of the future. It may be the best location where individuals wish to live, or the place that individuals dream about. There is no incorrect, and there is no right. Picture this, an ideal world of complete harmony and justice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |